What I wanted to ask you, just talk a little bit about why you became an architect. What was the decision-making process there?
I donāt know when it started, but I was always interested in plans and buildings, even in primary school and high school. Montreal High School on University Street, is that buildings still there?
Still there, yeah.
Itās a very clever design and I liked it. I can still draw the plan of that school from memory. The thing that impressed me was the cafeteria was on the fourth floor, the kitchen was in the middle over the front entrance and the goods lift, you call them? The goods lift was in a column in the front, classical pediment.
Never knew that.
Iāve got a picture of it. And thereās four columns and two solid bits and inside is the goods lift with a door down in the bottom that takes the stuff up from under the front entrance.
[1:17:13]
So this impressed you. Was this the biggest influence on your decision?
It certainly was an influence at the time. I said, āthis is just cleverā, you see. The cafeteria was sexually segregated.
Did you go to Montreal High School?
Yes, four years.
So then you got to know it pretty well.
Boys and girls segregated but the kitchen was in the middle over the main entrance. And the goods lift came down one of the columns and I thought that was just too clever!
[1:48:08]
Obviously, the architect at that time had a little more brains than most people had.
Yes. The whole plan is very clever. Itās shaped like an H to start with.
Thatās right.
And the way the gymnasiums fit with the assembly hall at the back and the fire escapes used to impress me because they were double scissor stairs, an up and a down. And you had to go outside before you went down the fire escape. And all that intrigued me so much and nobody else seemed to worry about what the building was like, but I thought it was fascinating.
[2:21:07]
But architecture in those years wasnāt a career that a lot of people pursued, was it?
No, very few. The school had only about twenty, twenty-five students.
So you literally moved across the streetā¦
I just moved across the street.
ā¦across University there. So what year did you enroll at the university?
ā36.
1936.
Yes. I was too young, I didnāt have the Mathematics, and we didnāt have any money either, it was the middle of the depression. So I donāt know. I think Philip Turner had a lot of wangling. He got me in without the Maths, but I had to take extra Maths in the first year with the engineers. And none of the other students had to take all these extra Maths.
[3:03:25]
Was it a five year course or a six year course
Yes, five, five in those days, yes.
Can you, I guess- Letās talk about some of the things that you were just talking to me about before. And you know we can talk about, you know, the studio, the way the studio- people moved from, what, the front to the back, the back to the front, I guess. And also the other- the business of the revolution when you were doing the mausoleum and so forth. You have a lot of interesting incidents that you should, as I said before, repeat to me.
Well, it was very hierarchical and old-fashioned. And in the first year, we werenāt allowed to speak to the fifth year, much less go near them, the other end of the room. The whole school was in one studio on the second floor of the Engineering Building. Is it still the Engineering Building?
[3:54:25]
No, theyāre in the MacDonald-Harrington Building now.
Oh, MacDonald- next door. The old one is, well, itās next door.
For a long period of time, they were in McConnell Engineering and then they went into- but they were also on McTavish many years ago too, McTavish Street for a short period of time. But they are in their own building now and itās been designed and itās quite a well-built structure.
Anyway, we were on the second floor with windows on two sides. And the first year, sat in the dark, and the second year, in the dark. The third year, I got a window. The fourth year was in the dark and the fifth year, got a window. And there was a big sink in the corner where we did our Watmanās hot-pressed stretchers. You donāt do those anymore.
[4:46:29]
No, no, no.
We had to stretch the paper and stick it onto a drawing board and youād draw on it with ink and washes with sediment, burnt umber and ultramarine blue, and these things took six months to do. You worked on them- classical orders, you know the- you did the-
The Ionic columns, the Doric columns, Corinthian columns.
Ionic columns, I did an ionic column. And-
Iāve seen some of Roy Wilsonās work.
They were magnificent, some of them. I threw mine all out when I came to England, and I wish Iād kept them because Iād have them on the wall now. They were such a lot of work. You know, a whole term for one drawing.
They donāt do any of that anymore.
Oh, itās such a-
I think some of the things we will be talking about, that phrase will become pretty common
They donāt do that that anymore, not at all. And of course heraldry in the second year. Lions rampant and flags and things. Itās quite ridiculous.
[5:46:29]
So did you take all your lectures in that one hall or did you go, for example in History of Architecture, did you go to a separate room for that?
Next door, there was the library where the lectures, the History lectures were kept. A little room with books, books on the walls.
And do you remember, how many, Enrico, how many were on staff that year?
Yes, well, Frank Chambers, Roy Wilson, Ramsay Traquair on the History. Now, who did Construction? Philip Turner did Construction and there was a young man, oh, Iāll try to remember his name, but he died in the middle of it. It was very sad. What was his name now? I canāt think of it. Anyway. And-
[6:37:10]
And you only had a student enrollment of, what, about fifteen or were there that many?
Five. Five for the year,
Five for all years?
Each year. There were only about twenty-five in the whole school, yes.
And Iām just trying to think, at that time, were any of the professors, youāre going to tell me in a minute, hopefully, about that revolution that you had, but I wanted to know, is there any particular courses that you enjoyed more than others? I mean did you enjoy the drawing? Of course-
I did enjoy the drawing where we had to draw parallel lines freehand. And I can still do it. I can draw perfectly straight lines a millimetre apart, you know!
Not after too much sherry, though!
The point is, of what use is that? But-
I know, exactly!
I enjoy it now. At meetings, staff meetings where I was teaching [unclear] very boring, and Iād do a lot of doodles. And Iām doodling straight lines parallel like I was taught at the first year at Ą¦°óSMÉēĒų. Iād doodle with a pen. Itās really quite ridiculous! And of course, Shades and Shadows. And Mathematics. And then they had a Survey School at MacDonald College. Do they still have that?
[7:53:26]
They still have it. Itās not at MacDonald College, itās another venue but they still have it.
That was at the end of the first year.
Most peopleās memories of that, it was a waste of time but it was a lot of fun.
Well, all I remember was the mud.
Oh yeah, we all remember the mud because itās that time of the year.
May.
May, yeah.
May and mud everywhere. And I wasnāt equipped with big boots or something. I went with shoes, ordinary shoes, I think the only pair I had, you know, in that we were in the middle of the Depression, you had one pair of shoes. And of course they got caked with mud. And it was the most uncomfortable- rain and mud, you know, I didnāt like it at all. And then you spent the first term of the second year drawing the map on one of these stretchers.
Oh, of course, thatās right, yes. [Unclear]
You drew it up. And I didnāt understand a word of this. You know, the tripod, the level.
The level, thatās right.
I could never understand how you could stand the thing in mud, and it would sink in mud and it would measure accurate measurements. I could never understand that.
[9:00:09]
You probably donāt today either, right?
No, I think I got it after awhile that the line is what counts.
And it seemed to me the key thing in all of that was to ensure that when you did everything, all the angles, that they came right back together.
I know. I used to be surprised that things happened. But I just didnāt see why the thing sticking in mud would do anything. Yes.
[9:21:06]
So tell us a little bit more about the studio work, because you said you were doing the drawings and you progressed, I guess, through. You werenāt allowed to do any housing or actual design. You did faƧades one year and then the housing or the-?
Not ātil the third year. The second year was lots of measured drawings. I measured the Kingās Lynn Courthouseā¦
Oh yeah.
ā¦Measured it. And the Biology building on University Street has a classical doorway and we measured that and drew it up. I think, apart from the fact that it went on too long, two years, to teach you how to do things, drawing and things, it was good for you. A foundation, because nowadays, of course, they donāt need to draw, they just use a computer or something.
[10:11:16]
Well, except that- theyāre still doing the drawing. Theyāre still- they have a course, as you know there, which is two- itās called Freehand- Sketching School.
Yes, yes.
And you go after or before any one of the terms with-
There were lots of measured drawings in the summer school, which was the Gordon Webber Sketching School, we went and measured French Canadian churches in the province of Quebec somewhere. I remember measuring one with two towers, where, I donāt know where it was, but we did that in the summer. May, I think, the summer after the second year. And then you had to work in an office every summer. And if you did two yearsā worth every summer, you got your degree at the end.
[11:01:22]
They still have that.
Yes. So the first summer, I worked for a firm called Shorey and Ritchie and I didnāt earn a penny. They donāt pay you anything; you were just there for the experience. And the second year, I think I got five pounds and a book. Five dollars, I beg your pardon. Five dollars and a book. And then third year, I went to another firm. In the fourth year, Philip Turner was building a church in Shawbridge. And he had me go and supervise it. So I stayed there I think six weeks. Iāve got lovely pictures of this church, which he designed and was built. And I, I donāt know, what do you call them, site-
Site supervisor.
Site supervisor.
Everybody, I think, as a young architect probably had exposure to that.
There was a wonderful scissors truss, you know, a scissors truss like that, which- The workmen were local work carpenters, and I laid this thing out on the ground with four by twos and six by twos, or two by fours, is it?
Two by fours, yeah.
Two by fours and two by sixes. And drilled holes. They put the bolts in and they stood it up and it didnāt spread an inch. They were surprised and so was I surprised! I thought when theyād stand it up it would all collapse! But it didnā t.
[12:32:22]
But you were telling me a few minutes ago before we were on camera about the design that all the students, the five of you, I guess, had to do in connection with a mausoleum for a war memorial.
Oh yes, the fourth year.
Thatās a fantastic story.
Thatās most important. In 1940, when there was all this- everybody was revolting, I think. John Bland had just arrived and there was talk of shutting the school down. There wasnāt worth bothering it. And John Bland fought for it. And we were thrown out at the end of the fourth year because we did this pantheon for the war dead ninety feet in diameter. And they expected a classical building, Chambers and Roy Wilson. They were classicists, you see, they wouldnāt allow anything else. But we were all revolutionaries, our year. So we did gas tanks or igloos or, I forget, but they were all just round, round things in concrete.
[14:27:00]
But you all agreed to take a non-classical approach.
All except one student, which shall be nameless, but he was the son of a famous architect in Montreal, Ross and MacDonaldā¦
Oh yeah, sure.
ā¦ the firm who built all those big buildings, Dominion Square buildings and things like that. Well, he was very conceited and he was going to go back to his fatherās office so he didnāt care if he passed or not. He was a very unpleasant young man. But the rest of us failed and thrown out and the school was going to be shut. And Philip Turner and John Bland, I think, were the influences and they got a reprieve and we were let back into the fifth year with Howard Fetherstonough looking after us. And we didnāt do anything the fifth year except look at John Blandās books on Le Corbusier, you see. And another thing, Catherine Chard, as sheās known, what do you call her now, Wisnicki.
[15:26:08]
Yeah. She got an honorary degree this year at Ą¦°óSMÉēĒų.
She got an honorary degree. Well she arrived when we were in the fifth year, the first woman ever to be allowed there. And, you know, it says in the book that they couldnāt have women in because there wasnāt a ladiesā lavatory in the building. In the end, John Bland adapted one. But she knew all about Le Corbusier and Gropius and Aalto, and weād never heard of them. Weād just heard of some American architects, modern ones, Hugh Stubbins and people like that, but weād never heard of the Europeans. And Catherine Chard arrived and she knew all about it.
Isnāt that interesting!
And so we had a wonderful time.
She came in as a, what, as a student?
First year student.
First year student!
Or maybe second year. I think she had all kinds of degrees before.
Because at that time, Ą¦°óSMÉēĒų was one of the few Schools of Architecture in Canada. I think there was, what, one in Toronto, maybe one in Winnipeg. I donāt think there was one at University of British Columbia, then. I donāt remember.
The British Columbia, Fred Lasserre started thatā¦
Oh yes, thatās right!
ā¦in the fifties or sixties.
And Brahm Weisman, I think, was one of the people there.
Yes, yes. So John Bland, we spent the whole of the first term just looking at books and finding out about modern architecture that we didnāt know anything about. It was a wonderful period! And then, the final term was your big, big thesis.
Your thesis, yeah.
And I did a reinforced concrete building, which nobody had ever thought of before. It was quite revolutionary.
[17:05:03]
Reinforced concrete?
Yes!
What was the subject of the building?
It was an apartment house. It looked very much like Tecton Highpoint, you know.
Oh yeah, ok.
Well, they had just been built, didnāt they, in ā36, ā38 and weād just were looking at plans. Anyway, they were all reinforced concrete walls. And when I designed it, I knew nothing about it, concrete or anything. But itās done. Iā ve got photographs of it for you.
[17:39:05]
Anyhow, what happened, I guess, after you graduated?
Well, we were all volunteers, but they- dreadful business. We had to go and fight Hitler, I donāt know why. You know, I donāt think I would do it now, but we were mad, you know. There was a student in my year, John Porter and Ron Peck from the year before, they also joined up. And before we went overseas, we saw quite a bit of each other for some reason. I think we were in the same military camp somewhere. Camp Borden, Petewawa.
Petewawa, yeah.
Yes, all those terrible places.
Did you ever get overseas though?
Yes, I was here for three years, all over Europe. You donāt want wartime experiences, do you?
No, I donāt want to.
We came over, a year in Canada and all those places, and then ā42, I came overseas and ā45 I did the war, the invasion.
Oh, the Normandy invasion?
Yes, I got as far as Munich when Hitler gave up in 1945.
[18:57:06]
So then, you came back to Montreal.
Yes.
I guess what you didnāt say, and I should have asked you, of course, you were going to Montreal High, so obviously, you were raised in Montreal and you had family there. So you went back in 1945 to Montreal.
Yes.
And what happened then?
Well, again, I didnāt know what I wanted to do. I got a job with T. Pringle and Son.
Oh, geez!
Youāve heard of them, have you? Because they werenāt architects.
No, they were sort of Engineeringā¦
Thatās right.
ā¦but they did hire architects.
I said, āI will not work with any architects. Theyāre all horrible, you seeā. There probably were some good ones, but I didnāt know about them. I went to work for Pringleās and I stayed there, oh, I donāt know, six months or so, and it was pretty horrible. I said, āI am never going to sit stuck to a drawing board for the rest of my life from nine ātill six doing thisā, so I said, āIām going to study Musicā. And I went to University of Michigan. The government wanted me to stay in Canada; they were going to pay for graduate studies. But there was no graduate studies in Canada, Architecture or anything. So they would only allow me to do Architecture. They wouldnāt let me do Music, because Music would mean Iād have to start from the beginning and they werenāt prepared to pay my fees for that. They were prepared to pay fees for graduate studies, and as I had a degree in Architecture, it had to be Architecture. So I went to get an M.A. at the University of Michigan, you see.
[20:42:12]
An M.A. in Architecture or Music?
Architecture.
Okay, so you took your M.A. at University of Michigan, as you explained-
āCause Harvard and Yale you couldnāt get into anyway. So Michigan. And while I was there, I went home for Christmas, and John Bland said, āyouāve got to come and teach hereā. And he got me. So I left Michigan, and went to teach at Ą¦°óSMÉēĒų and thatās where it all started.
[21:09:27]
So this would be, what, now ā48? 1948?
ā47. ā46, ā47, yes.
And you stayed at Ą¦°óSMÉēĒų teaching for-
āTill ā48.
āTill ā48.
Yes. Just two years.
And what were you teaching?
Well, I started with the first year and then they promoted me to the fourth year, and the second year and, goodness, what would have happened if Iād stayed there longer! I ran the library. My interest in books, you see, my father had a huge library at home. And the Blackader Library at Redpathā¦
Yup. Still there.
ā¦was a nuisance. And John Bland persuaded them to allow us to move all the architecture books into that one in- that house in University Street. You know, the house that is now demolished. Before- Between the Engineering Building and McConnell, thereās -
[22:08:24]
Okay, yeah. So you moved all the books in there?
Not all of them.
All the architecture books?
Just one room. There was a room on the ground floor. We put up some shelves, and I was the librarian. And they gave me a course on the Dewey Decimal System or something. And I catalogued all the books and had all the catalogue.
And you were teaching as well though.
Teaching the fourth year and running this library. I think I ran it sort of in the afternoons for an hour or so, for the students. Well, it was much nicer, especially in winter, to go trekking across to the Blackader. I donāt know, they still have a library in architecture?
[22:47:00]
They still have- the architecture library is all the Blackader now, and itās admired tremendously.
Well youāve got all kinds of lovely young ladies lying around this school. There was nobody there but John Bland and me!
Those young ladies wouldnāt want to be described as ālying aroundā. They may say, āWe prefer sitting aroundā.
Sitting around, yes, sort ofā¦
Now, 1948ā¦
Yes.
ā¦you left the school?
Yes, I came to England. For one year, I was grumbling all the time, arguing with Spence-Sales, and it was just miserable as anything. I think the war had a lot to do with it. And the fact- you donāt remember Montreal what it was like when you were a boy-
Well, I remember Montreal in ā48 and ā50 and that-
It was pretty dull, a dull spot. You have to have a pioneer spirit like John Bland had to see into the future. Well, I didnāt have that. I was naĆÆve or I still wanted to learn, I think. I wanted to see things, do things. And I had enjoyed my three years in England, even during the war, you see. So I said, āIā m going back thereā. John Bland said, āAll right, go for a year and then come back. Your job will be still here for youā. And he got me the job teaching at the AA.
[24:08:08]
Oh, I see.
āCause he had been there as a student and he knew everybody. So he actually got me a teaching job at the AA, which was- He did all that, he didnāt want me to go, but he still did it, you know, wonderful man!
So you came to London for a year, and you worked at the AA and then you went back to Montreal again?
No, Iām still here!
You told me you went to Paris, you wanted to go to Paris.
I wanted to go to Paris but even that was stopped, because I did this first competition. Iām mad, you see.
You did a competition when you were in London, which you won.
Yes, thatās right. Poole Technical College in Dorset. And I won it, you see. There was, you know, two hundred- a hundred and fifty-three entrantsā¦
And you won it!
And I won it, you see, a little colonial hick from the Colonies beat all these English! They were all desperate for work just after the war, and everybody entered into this competition, even James Stirling, you know, and he didnāt even get a mention. Iām very proud of that.
[25:18:25]
Did you do this completely on your own?
All my own in my basement bedsit in Bedford Place.
You must have been exhilarated when you won this.
I just couldnāt understand what was going on. I didnāt sleep. I just was terrified.
You told me earlier you were blessed with a client who wanted to get it built, because as you well know, there are a lot of competitions the project never gets built. So in this-
Well, this one was absolutely built. Not all of it, theyāve left a bit out. Even now, itās unfinished. But they built in sections. They built the first section the first five years and then they built the next section the next five years, and so I was still here. But the next five years, I had won another competition. You see, I do two of everything. And that was a large civic centre in Corby. And that one took ten years to built. So I was stuck here.
So youā¦
By that time, I had become a native, and drank teaā¦
So you were, as you said, you were never able to go back home.
Never could go back home. Visits in between.
Itās interesting because those competitions have been the catalyst for a lot of firms, for a lot of architects. Because Arthur Erickson won a competition which he produced to start him off, and of course, Ray Affleckās firm won competitions which built up their reputation and confldence.
Yes, it does. But not mine, because I wasnāt a good businessman. I built them properly but I always liked to go back to teaching, you see, I much preferred it. So I went back to teaching between.
[26:59:00]
But you kept your practice at the same time or did you-
Except that it stopped after twenty years of practice. And then the last ten years, it was all teaching. Oh, I did little things. Little houses, odd houses for people. Shop, thereās some offices on Regent Street for Langs, the builders, which I did. And I did a little swimming pool for them up in their house in Totteridge. I did little things while I was teaching.
[27:26:04]
Did you enjoy the life of an architect, because, I mean it was very [unclear].
I enjoyed designing the buildings and watching them being built, but I hated being a businessman. I was horrible!
I think all architects are in the same situation.
I had to hire a staff, and rent an office, and a secretary, and pay them wages. And there was never enough money for me. I didnāt pay myself anything. I had to pay them all their wages.
[27:53:18]
When you think of the responsibility and the work that the architecture profession is sort of a very unheralded and lack in revenue for the-
Well now, they are all big businessmen, arenāt they? But they were still in my day, they were gentlemen, and you never did anything wrong. If anything was wrong, somebody else got the blame, the builder, or the quantity surveyor, but the architect never got the blame. He was a gentleman, you see.
[28:25:10]
I just wanted to ask you, because you worked both with Harold Spence-Sales and I guess he was a professor for quite a few years at Ą¦°óSMÉēĒų, and also, Gordon Webber had a studio there too, so-
Well, I didnāt actually work with Gordon Webber and his students, but I used to do, what do you call them, some of his abstract constructions. I was learning from him like the students were, because my education before the war was useless. Well not, I mean, Iām glad Iāve had all this technical stuff and History. But compared to the twentieth century, I knew nothing, you see. And so I was learning form Gordon Webber and I would do constructions and dia-drawings and things. I donāt know if he approved of them or not.
[29:23:17]
Because, a lot of people- His name around Montreal is pretty well forgotten. But at one time in the history of Montreal, he was quite an artist.
He was very famous.
He did a lot of work. And it was not only two-dimensional but it was three-dimensional because I know he got into, what, dancing and all sorts of stage productions and everything else.
Yes, he did a ballet and things. Itās all in a little book there. They did exhibitions. We did a lot of work with him. I used to help, you know, whatever I could do, I helped. John Bland did an exhibition of modern furniture inā47, which I worked on. And he brought all his Alvar Aalto stuff from England, and weād never seen anything like it in Canada before. It was quite wonderful. And they put this exhibition of modern interior at the gallery in Sherbrooke Street.
[30:23:18]
The Museum of Fine Arts there?
Yes, it used to be called the Art Gallery in those days. And this exhibition was in one of the rooms there and we did a lot of work there. I think I was a guard, where you keep people from touching things. And then we did an exhibition of Le Corbusier in the Engineering Building in ā47, the first in Canada ever. And they came up from the Museum of Modern Art in New York to interview it. And Doug Shadbolt, he helped on that one. I made him do a mural.
Was he a student at that time, because he was a student-
No, I think he was finished by that time, ā47.
Well, he was a student also with Arthur Erickson, wasnāt he?
He was a studentā¦ No, I taught him in ā46 and Arthur Erickson, so maybe he was still a student or maybe he was finished.
Because I didnāt realize, I did an interview of both Arthur Erickson and Doug Shadbolt, and they were- came to Ą¦°óSMÉēĒų together, I think. They went down to Washington State University in Washington and-
Wait, well, I didnāt behave like a professor at all. I was one of the bunch. We all worked together.
The best type, the best way of doing it.
Yes, you get on with the students.
[31:45:27]
Do you, I just want to ask you, there are a couple of other people I wanted to ask you about. Did you work with Harold at all, Spence-Sales?
No, I never got on with him at all.
Youāre not the first one!
I think, I just- I knew nothing of town-planning, anyway. But I thought- anyway, I was full of Le CorbusierāsĀ la ville radieuseĀ and things like that, and he was Garden City, and I thought that was horrible. I didnāt approve of anything sentimental like that. But he was probably right in that to introduce planning to Canada, you have to start like that. You canāt just suddenly hit them on the head. But I was a naĆÆve youngster, thinking you must have Le Corbusier or nothing, you know.
[32:37:06]
You mentioned, in one of the pictures or at least you mentioned, Ray Affleck. Did you teach Ray?
Yes. I think he was still in the fifth year when I got there in ā47.
And he kept in touch with you over time?
Yes, he came here to see me with his wife, yes. Interesting, I donāt know if Iā ve got one, we use them as ashtrays, so we donāt have ashtrays now. Pavement lights, you know, toughened glass that you walk on. And his wife thought that was wonderful, that this was that pavement light, which you turned it upside down and itās used as an ashtray. Iāve got one downstairs or upstairs. And she took one away with her. And I was always impressed. She thought that was a lovely idea.
[33:29:16]
I have a couple of other question, if I may, just because Iām sort of curious, and anybody else who will probably see this interview will be curious, do you still have family members back in Montreal?
Me? Well, I have two sisters, one in Montreal and one in Vancouver.
Oh, isnāt that interesting.
Yes, one is a widow in Vancouver. I think her husband worked for the Bristol Aircraft, I think.
And you have a sister in Montreal.
Montreal. She keeps me informed about all whatever youāre doing. Oh, I get clippings sent to me all the time about Catherine Chardās honour. They gave her a degree.
[34:04:12]
So she has that interest.
Yes, my sister sent it to me.
But not all sisters have the same interest in their brother.
Well, sheās got nothing better to do, sheās 84.
Well, anyhow.
Itās pretty ancient!
The other thing I wanted to ask you is youāve been here now pretty well all your life. Your whole career has been in London. Do you ever see any of the- have you ever heard anything-? I guess not the last- youāve probably outlived a lot of the people that youāve graduated with. But have you talked to any of them recently or-?
No, I think Iāve lost all contact. The last time I was there was ā72-ā73 when I taught at Toronto. One of my AA students ran the school at Toronto. Whatās his [unclear] Pragnell, Peter Pragnell.
Oh yeah, Peter Pragnell, yeah.
Yes. So he invited me over there for a year so I went.
Isnāt that wonderful!
And in Toronto there was one or two students, I forget what his name now.
I probably wouldnāt know.
And then I went to Ą¦°óSMÉēĒų to give a lecture and John Bland invited me to one of the lectures, one to, what do they call them, criticizing studentsā work? Juries or something?
Juries, yes.
He invited me to one of those.
Isnāt that interesting.
Yes. That was very nice. It was nice sitting next to John Bland looking at studentsā works again. That was in 1974.
[35:36:17]
I guess if I were to ask you if you whether you would do it all over again, you would probably say yes.
Yes.
In retrospect, a lot of people would change things. And I mean thatās only natural. But the way you talk, youāve had a very balanced, you know, a very fulfilling life.
Well, talking to other people, they seem to think that my life has been far more interesting than working in a bank all your life or-
Well, I think it has been. So has mine.
I think it has been. Iāve done lots of sillyish short things, ten years here, ten years there, and I havenāt settled down. I still havenāt settled down.
You probably every now and again wake up and you look out on a beautiful day like today and say, āboy, am I every lucky. Itās been a great lifeā. And itās a bonus to be-
Well, this house is pretty lucky as well. In the middle of London, a little house like this, nearly Corbusier strip windows and stuff.
The way youāve furnished it, itās a very comfortable place too.
And itās all Corbusier. Itās all very old-fashioned, isnāt it? You see, 1929.
Those chairs and the furniture doesnāt go out of fashion because itās classic.
They are classics and the angle poise and this stuff.
The irony of all of this, here you are after that revolution, surrounded by classic design items, classic in the generic sense as opposed to-
It will all come back one of these days.
Just like us!
Iāll be the latest thing one of these days!
[36:55:02]